Step 1
Unite with Fellow Investors
Step 2
Choose the Best Attorney
Step 3
Provide Documents
Step 4
Follow Case Progress
Step 5
Get Payout
RCAT.US
id: 1611
Red Cat Holdings ($RCAT) Drone Production Hype, Inflated Army Contract, and Insider Stock Sales Case
Investors can submit applications for the lead plaintiff role.
D. New Jersey
Court2:25-cv-05427
Case number03/18/2022
Class period Start01/15/2025
Class period End07/22/2025
Lead Plaintiff motion deadline- $RCAT investors filed a claim against Red Cat Holdings for inflating drone production capabilities and misleading the market about the size of a major U.S. Army contract.
- After a critical report revealed the SRR contract was worth far less than claimed and exposed years of exaggerated manufacturing claims, $RCAT fell 21.54% on January 16, 2025.
Case Details:
Between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, Red Cat told investors it could produce “thousands of drones per month” at its Salt Lake City facility and implied it was positioned to secure hundreds of millions to over $1 billion from the U.S. Army’s Short Range Reconnaissance (SRR) program.
In reality, the plant could only produce about 100 drones per month, and its full buildout required further investment. Red Cat’s leadership knew this, but continued to make public statements suggesting mass production was already underway.
The company also overstated the value of its November 2024 SRR contract. Executives suggested up to $79 million in revenue for 2025 alone. However, on January 16, 2025, Kerrisdale Capital released documents indicating that the Army had only allocated $20–25 million annually for the program, including spares and training. Kerrisdale also revealed Red Cat announced the win without Army approval, potentially complicating future negotiations.
On the same day, Red Cat’s stock plunged 21.54%. The report also flagged suspicious insider sales: CEO Jeffrey Thompson and CTO George Matus sold over $14.9 million in stock shortly after the SRR win was announced.
Based on these events, $RCAT investors filed a claim against Red Cat Holdings, accusing the company of the following:
- It misled investors about the true production capacity of its drone facility and overstated readiness.
- It exaggerated the expected revenue from the U.S. Army contract by several hundred million dollars.
- It failed to disclose that the contract announcement lacked Army approval, risking future negotiations.
Considering all the representations, investors believe Red Cat concealed serious operational problems and misled the market to maintain its valuation and growth story.
Case Type
US Securities Class Action
Case Status
Lead Plaintiff Submission
Alleged Offence
Misleading Statements,
Financial Misrepresentation,
Fraud,
Failure to Disclose
Suspected Party
Directors,
Management
Security Type
Stocks
Trade Direction
Long
Shock Event Date
01/16/2025
Filing date
05/23/2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline
07/22/2025