Sign In
Step 1
Draft
Step 2
Unite with Fellow Investors
Step 3
Choose the Best Attorney
Step 4
Provide Documents
Step 5
Follow Case Progress
Step 6
Get Payout
EXTR.US
id: 1315

Extreme Networks ($EXTR) $51 Million Investor Settlement

The settlement terms have been submitted to the court for approval.
$51,000,000
Cash Settlement
N.D. California
Court
3:24-cv-05102
Case number
07/27/2022
Class period Start
01/30/2024
Class period End

Extreme Networks and its executives agreed to a proposed $51 million settlement resolving claims that investors were misled about the company’s revenue growth, customer demand, and order backlog.

Outline:

Extreme Networks reported strong business performance while carrying a substantial order backlog. Investors later alleged that the backlog did not accurately reflect underlying customer demand and that revenue growth was overstated. A series of disclosures concerning demand and backlog was followed by substantial declines in Extreme’s stock price. Extreme agreed to resolve the claims for $51 million.

Timeline:

  • January 25, 2023: Extreme’s customer demand and product backlog reached the market, beginning a series of disclosures that plaintiffs claim revealed previously concealed problems.

  • August 25, 2023: Additional information concerning Extreme’s backlog and customer demand was disclosed.

  • November 1, 2023: A further corrective disclosure period began as Extreme released additional information concerning its revenue growth, demand, and backlog.

  • January 31, 2024: Additional information about Extreme’s business performance and backlog reached investors through February 2, 2024.

  • October 15, 2026: The parties executed the formal settlement agreement reflecting the proposed $51 million resolution.

Background:

Extreme Networks experienced a substantial increase in its order backlog during a period when supply constraints affected the networking industry. Investors allege that the size of the backlog was presented as evidence of strong demand and future revenue growth.

The lawsuit claims that the backlog did not accurately reflect the strength of Extreme’s underlying business. According to plaintiffs, customer ordering patterns had created demand that was not sustainable, while the company’s statements about revenue growth and its backlog allegedly gave investors an overly positive picture of future performance.

Beginning in January 2023, information concerning Extreme’s customer demand and backlog began reaching the market through a series of partial disclosures. Plaintiffs allege that each disclosure revealed additional information that had previously been obscured by the company’s reported backlog and revenue results.

Those disclosures continued through early 2024. According to the lawsuit, the complete picture of weaker demand and the declining backlog emerged over time, and Extreme’s stock fell from a high of $32.27 per share to $12.59 by the conclusion of the alleged corrective disclosure period.

Investors subsequently accused Extreme and its executives of making material misrepresentations and omissions and engaging in deceptive conduct concerning the true nature of the company’s revenue results, growth, customer demand, and backlog.

Extreme and the individual defendants deny that they made materially misleading statements or violated federal securities laws. After extensive discovery and mediation, the parties agreed to resolve the litigation for $51 million.

What Can Investors Expect Now?

Extreme Networks and its executives agreed to a proposed $51 million settlement resolving claims that investors were misled about the company’s revenue growth, customer demand, and order backlog.

If you were damaged due to this situation, you can file for a payout and get your share of the settlement. You can check if you are eligible and other details in the FAQ section.

Case Type
US Securities Class Action
Case Status
Stipulative Settlement
Alleged Offence
Mismanagement, 
Misleading Statements, 
Omissions
Suspected Party
Directors, 
Management
Security Type
Stocks
Trade Direction
Long
Filing date
08/13/2024
Lead Plaintiff Deadline
10/14/2024
Plaintiffs
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension & Retirement Security Funds
Attorneys
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Francisco, CA)
Defendants
Edward B. Meyercord, III, Rmi Thomas, Cristina Tate, Kevin Rhodes
Judge
Hon. Trina L. Thompson
Administrator
A.B. Data Ltd
Attorney fee
$15,150,000
Trades matching type
FIFO

Frequently Asked Questions